# Discourse vs ibl.ai/os

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Discourse | ibl.ai/os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 48 029 ✓ | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

ibl.ai/os ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.

If you want the quickest setup, Discourse is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

Discourse is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)
- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-os-2