# Discourse vs IPFS Web UI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Discourse | IPFS Web UI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 48 026 ✓ | 1 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

IPFS Web UI ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.

If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Discourse needs more configuration.

Discourse is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)
- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-ipfs-webui