# disco-daemon vs dokploy

> Two self-hosted [Platform as a Service projects](https://selfhost.directory/platform-as-a-service), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | disco-daemon | dokploy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 175 | 38 094 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +608 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.27.1 · 16 Jan 2026 | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

dokploy scores 80/100 against 48/100 for disco-daemon, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for disco-daemon.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; disco-daemon needs more configuration.

dokploy is growing faster right now (+608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [disco-daemon](https://selfhost.directory/project/disco-daemon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/disco-daemon.md)
- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/disco-daemon-vs-dokploy