directusvsopenwhisk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| directus | openwhisk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 13 in Headless CMS | #2 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 38 698 | 6 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +742 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v12.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
directus scores 79/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.
directus ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.
If you want the quickest setup, directus is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.
directus is growing faster right now (+742 stars in 30 days).
directus details →openwhisk details →
Swap a project
Keep directus, compare it with
Keep openwhisk, compare it with