# dir2opds vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dir2opds | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 123 | 549 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.12.0 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 49/100 for dir2opds, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for dir2opds.

If you want the quickest setup, dir2opds is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dir2opds](https://selfhost.directory/project/dir2opds) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dir2opds.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dir2opds-vs-openreader