# dify vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dify | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in AI Workflows | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 159 851 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 841 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 1.18.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

dify scores 90/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

dify ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, dify is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.

dify is growing faster right now (+2 841 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dify](https://selfhost.directory/project/dify) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dify.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dify-vs-qfieldcloud