# DietPi vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DietPi | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Operating System | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 6 367 | 15 905 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v10.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

DietPi scores 71/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

DietPi ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; DietPi needs more configuration.

DietPi is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DietPi](https://selfhost.directory/project/dietpi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dietpi.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dietpi-vs-transfersh