# DesktopCommanderMCP vs ZhikunCode

> Two self-hosted [Cursor alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/cursor), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DesktopCommanderMCP | ZhikunCode |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in LLM Integration | #34 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 10 154 ✓ | 532 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 21 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

DesktopCommanderMCP scores 73/100 against 51/100 for ZhikunCode, so it is the safer default.

DesktopCommanderMCP ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ZhikunCode.

If you want the quickest setup, DesktopCommanderMCP is easier to run; ZhikunCode needs more configuration.

DesktopCommanderMCP is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DesktopCommanderMCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/desktopcommandermcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/desktopcommandermcp.md)
- [ZhikunCode](https://selfhost.directory/project/zhikuncode) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zhikuncode.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/desktopcommandermcp-vs-zhikuncode