# DesktopCommanderMCP vs Langfuse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DesktopCommanderMCP | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in LLM Integration | #9 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 10 154 | 36 655 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 | +1 672 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 161 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Langfuse scores 86/100 against 73/100 for DesktopCommanderMCP, so it is the safer default.

Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for DesktopCommanderMCP.

If you want the quickest setup, DesktopCommanderMCP is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.

Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 672 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DesktopCommanderMCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/desktopcommandermcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/desktopcommandermcp.md)
- [Langfuse](https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langfuse.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)
- [Langfuse vs Opik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-opik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/desktopcommandermcp-vs-langfuse