# deer-flow vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 84 580 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 659 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 659 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s