# deer-flow vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 84 652 ✓ | 810 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 704 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

ytdlp_web_player ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 704 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-ytdlpwebplayer