# deer-flow vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 84 634 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 686 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

unraid-config-guardian ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, unraid-config-guardian is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 686 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-unraid-config-guardian