# deer-flow vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 589 ✓ | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 668 ✓ | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 668 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-unopim