# deer-flow vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 84 629 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 681 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 681 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-tube-archivist