# deer-flow vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 84 551 | 117 613 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 630 | +5 254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow and TradingAgents score the same (86/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-tradingagents