# deer-flow vs timeoff-management-application

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | timeoff-management-application |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) |
| GitHub stars | 84 583 ✓ | 1 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 662 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 57/100 for timeoff-management-application, so it is the safer default.

deer-flow ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timeoff-management-application.

If you want the quickest setup, timeoff-management-application is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 662 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [timeoff-management-application](https://selfhost.directory/project/timeoff-management-application) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/timeoff-management-application.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-timeoff-management-application