# deer-flow vs swarm-cronjob

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | swarm-cronjob |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 84 602 ✓ | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 654 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.

swarm-cronjob ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 654 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [swarm-cronjob](https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-swarm-cronjob