# deer-flow vs Super Productivity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | Super Productivity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 574 ✓ | 23 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 ✓ | +1 002 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 83/100 for Super Productivity, so it is the safer default.

Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [Super Productivity](https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-super-productivity