deer-flowvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 84 574 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
deer-flow ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →supabase-automated-self-host details →