deer-flowvsshotshare
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | shotshare | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 9 in Image Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 611 | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 663 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 45/100 for shotshare, so it is the safer default.
deer-flow ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for shotshare.
If you want the quickest setup, shotshare is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 663 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →shotshare details →