# deer-flow vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 84 589 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 668 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 668 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor