# deer-flow vs Rocket.Chat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | Rocket.Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 13 in Instant Messaging |
| GitHub stars | 84 580 ✓ | 46 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 659 ✓ | +187 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 36 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | 8.5.4 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Rocket.Chat, so it is the safer default.

Rocket.Chat ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, Rocket.Chat is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 659 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-rocketchat