# deer-flow vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 84 589 ✓ | 8 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 668 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

deer-flow ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

If you want the quickest setup, R2R is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 668 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-r2r