# deer-flow vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 84 634 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 686 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 686 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-qwc2