deer-flowvsQuestarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | Questarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 84 629 | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 681 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
Questarr ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 681 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →Questarr details →