# deer-flow vs ProxMenux

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | ProxMenux |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 15 in Backup Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 560 ✓ | 3 241 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.2.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 62/100 for ProxMenux, so it is the safer default.

ProxMenux ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, ProxMenux is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [ProxMenux](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmenux.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-proxmenux