# deer-flow vs PowerSync Service

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | PowerSync Service |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #35 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 615 ✓ | 397 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 667 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.27.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 49/100 for PowerSync Service, so it is the safer default.

PowerSync Service ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 667 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [PowerSync Service](https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/powersync-service.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-powersync-service