# deer-flow vs PhotoMigrator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | PhotoMigrator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 639 ✓ | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 691 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.

PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoMigrator is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 691 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [PhotoMigrator](https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-photomigrator