# deer-flow vs pandaprobe

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | pandaprobe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #43 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 84 654 ✓ | 792 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 706 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.

pandaprobe ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, pandaprobe is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 706 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [pandaprobe](https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-pandaprobe