# deer-flow vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 84 602 ✓ | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 654 ✓ | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 654 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-octobot