# deer-flow vs MunkiReport

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | MunkiReport |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 11 in Device Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 652 ✓ | 408 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 704 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v5.8.2 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 55/100 for MunkiReport, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, MunkiReport is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 704 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [MunkiReport](https://selfhost.directory/project/munkireport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/munkireport.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-munkireport