# deer-flow vs mmar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | mmar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #112 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 84 574 ✓ | 311 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.3.0 · 6 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 45/100 for mmar, so it is the safer default.

deer-flow ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for mmar.

If you want the quickest setup, mmar is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [mmar](https://selfhost.directory/project/mmar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mmar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-mmar