# deer-flow vs mkcertWeb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | mkcertWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management |
| GitHub stars | 84 629 ✓ | 221 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 681 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.

mkcertWeb ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, mkcertWeb is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 681 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [mkcertWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-mkcertweb