# deer-flow vs microclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | microclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #30 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 84 580 ✓ | 749 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 659 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.11.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 52/100 for microclaw, so it is the safer default.

microclaw ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, microclaw is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 659 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [microclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/microclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/microclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-microclaw