# deer-flow vs marm-memory

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | deer-flow | marm-memory |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #26 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 84 602 ✓ | 424 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 654 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v2.60.1 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

deer-flow scores 86/100 against 53/100 for marm-memory, so it is the safer default.

marm-memory ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.

If you want the quickest setup, marm-memory is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.

deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 654 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [deer-flow](https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deer-flow.md)
- [marm-memory](https://selfhost.directory/project/marm-memory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/marm-memory.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deer-flow-vs-marm-memory