deer-flowvsLiquidsoap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | Liquidsoap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 84 611 | 1 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 663 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
Liquidsoap ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 663 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →Liquidsoap details →