deer-flowvsJupyterLab
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | JupyterLab | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in Data Science |
| GitHub stars | 84 611 | 15 379 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 663 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 12 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v4.7.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 78/100 for JupyterLab, so it is the safer default.
JupyterLab ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, JupyterLab is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 663 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →JupyterLab details →