deer-flowvsHindsight
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | Hindsight | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 84 551 | 54 589 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 630 | +2 542 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.1.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 85/100 for Hindsight, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Hindsight is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow details →Hindsight details →All AI Agents projects →