DeepSeek-OCR-WebUIvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek-OCR-WebUI | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in OCR | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 447 | 4 111 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 47/100 for DeepSeek-OCR-WebUI, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; DeepSeek-OCR-WebUI needs more configuration.
Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek-OCR-WebUI details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep DeepSeek-OCR-WebUI, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with