# DeepSeek Harness vs yoink

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | yoink |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #31 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 ✓ | 151 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.1.0 · 12 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 45/100 for yoink, so it is the safer default.

yoink ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, yoink is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [yoink](https://selfhost.directory/project/yoink) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yoink.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-yoink