# DeepSeek Harness vs 心潮动态心智系统

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | 心潮动态心智系统 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 217 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.

心潮动态心智系统 ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [心潮动态心智系统](https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xinchao-dynamic-mind.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-xinchao-dynamic-mind