# DeepSeek Harness vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-wyoming-piper