# DeepSeek Harness vs Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 ✓ | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.

Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-wrp