# DeepSeek Harness vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 265 690 ✓ | 89 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 698 ✓ | +2 423 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 86/100 for World Monitor, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 698 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-world-monitor