# DeepSeek Harness vs WireGuard Easy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | WireGuard Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 ✓ | 27 322 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 ✓ | +326 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 73/100 for WireGuard Easy, so it is the safer default.

WireGuard Easy ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [WireGuard Easy](https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-wireguard-easy