# DeepSeek Harness vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 1 505 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 53/100 for usque, so it is the safer default.

usque ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-usque