# DeepSeek Harness vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-url-to-png