# DeepSeek Harness vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api