# DeepSeek Harness vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

unbagrnd ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-unbagrnd