# DeepSeek Harness vs UmlautAdaptarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | UmlautAdaptarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 634 ✓ | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 642 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.

UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 642 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [UmlautAdaptarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-umlautadaptarr